Effects of dietary levels of alfalfa and Sericea lespedeza hay on feed intake and growth performance by growing Alpine doelings and Katahdin ewe lambs

TitleEffects of dietary levels of alfalfa and Sericea lespedeza hay on feed intake and growth performance by growing Alpine doelings and Katahdin ewe lambs
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
AuthorsWang, W, Puchala, R, Ribeiro, LPS, Portugal, I, Gipson, TA, Goetsch, AL
JournalJournal of Animal Science
Volume98
IssueSupplement
AbstractTwenty-four Alpine doelings (initial BW and age of 25.3±0.55 kg and 10.4±0.11 mo, respectively) and 24 Katahdin ewe lambs (24; 28.3±1.02 kg and 9.6±0.04 mo, respectively) were used to determine effects of dietary levels of alfalfa and Sericea lespedeza on feed intake and growth performance. The treatment arrangement was a 2 × 3 factorial. Animals were housed in pens fitted with Calan feeding gates during the study with 4 periods, the first 3 42 d in length and the fourth 47 d. Diets consumed ad libitum were 75% coarsely ground hay. Forage was alfalfa, a 1:1 mixture of alfalfa and lespedeza, and lespedeza. There were no significant interactions between breed and diet or significant three-way interactions involving period (P>0.05). Intake of DM in g/d was much greater for Katahdin than for Alpine (P<0.001; 1,817 vs. 1,274; SEM=51.1), with differences of lesser magnitude in % BW (P=0.063; 4.14 vs. 3.84; SEM=0.110) and g/kg BW0.75 (P=0.001; 106 vs. 92; SEM=0.993). All expressions of DMI were similar among diets (P≥0.199; 1,600, 1,585, and 1,452 g/d, SEM=62.6; 3.97, 4.10, and 3.89% BW, SEM=0.134; 99, 102, and 96 g/kg BW0.75 for alfalfa, alfalfa-lespedeza, and lespedeza, SEM=3.2). The ADG was greater for Katahdin than for Alpine (P<0.001; 180 vs. 88 g, SEM=5.0) and ranked (P<0.05) alfalfa > alfalfa-lespedeza > lespedeza (159, 132, and 111 g, respectively; SEM=6.1). The ratio of ADG:DMI was greater for Katahdin than for Alpine (P<0.001; 104 vs. 72 g/kg; SEM=3.4) and greatest among diets for alfalfa (P<0.05; 101, 84, and 79 g/kg for alfalfa alfalfa-lespedeza, and lespedeza, respectively; SEM=4.2). In conclusion, the two small ruminant breeds and species responded similarly to dietary characteristics as impacted by the different forage levels.