|
HAGENIA ABYSSINICA(KOSSO) FOR INTERNAL PARASITE CONTROL IN GOATS
G. Abebe1, L. J. Dawson2,
G. Detweiler2, T. A. Gipson2 and T. Sahlu2
1Awassa College of Agriculture, P.O.
Box 5, Awassa, Ethiopia
2E
(Kika) de la Garza Institute for Goat Research, Langston University, Langston, OK, USA
Introduction
There are currently 5
million goats in the USA, with potential to produce mohair, meat, and cashmere
worth $550 million/year. Recently, interest in goat meat has risen, fueled
by the increasing demand by ethnic populations within the USA. Despite the
spiraling number of goats slaughtered in the USA, the demand for goat meat is
much greater than the domestic supply. Thus, considerable goat meat is imported
from Australia and New Zealand. In 1990, the USA imported 1,362 metric tons
of chilled or frozen goat meat, at a value of $1.86 million. By 1992, imports
rose by 70% to 2,362 metric tons, with a value of $3.6 million.
The domestic shortfall
in goat production can be addressed by either increasing the number of goats
or improving production of the existing population (Poore, 1993). In regard
to the latter mode, internal and external parasites seriously limit both per
head productivity and the density at which goats can be raised on farms. In
ruminants, high internal nematode burdens suppress live weight gain, reproductive
efficiency, milk and wool production (Blackburn et al., 1991) and sometimes
even result in death (Rahman and Collins, 1990). In the Australian and New
Zealand sheep industries, the annual economic loss attributed to nematodes is
estimated at $400 (Gray, 1987) and $270 million (Parker, 1991), respectively,
despite an anthelmintic expenditure of $50 million by Australian farmers (Gray,
1987). Similar estimates are not readily available for the USA small ruminant
industry, but it is believed that economic losses are of similar magnitude (SR-CRSP,
1991).
Conventional methods to
control internal parasites include anthelmintic drenching, pasture spelling,
crop rotation, and integrated grazing systems using stock with low internal
parasite susceptibility. Anthelmintic use, by far the least complex of control
options, is currently the preferred method for internal parasite management
(Jackson, 1991; Zajac and Moore, 1993). Unfortunately, after many years of
heavy reliance on anthelmintics for internal parasite control, parasite resistance
has emerged. Anthelmintic resistance has been documented across the world,
including Africa (Maingi, 1991), Asia (Dorny et al., 1993), and North America
(DeVaney et al., 1992). Anthelmintic resistance of internal parasite populations
exists for all current drug families including benzimidazole (McKenna, 1990),
levamisole (Verady et al., 1993), ivermectin (DeVaney et al., 1992), and tomorantel
(Anderson et al., 1988). In some studies, internal parasite populations have
multiple resistances. To avoid anthelmintic resistance, goat producers must
reduce reliance on anthelmintics and seek alternative, sustainable methods for
internal nematode control.
Medicinal plants such
as Hagenia abyssinica (Kosso) and Glinus lotoides (Hirta)
contain substances with nematocidal activity (Abegaz and Dagne, 1978). The
ability to control nematode infestation in humans through use of plants with
anthelmintic properties has been recognized and is widely used in countries
such as Ethiopia (Abegaz and Dagne, 1978; Sofowora, 1982). However, potential
use of these plants as anthelmintics and optimal dosing regimes for ruminants
have yet to be identified. Thus, the objective of this research was
to examine the anthelmintic activity of Hagenia abyssinica (Kosso) in
growing Alpine goats.
Material and Methods
Fresh fecal samples were
collected from Alpine goats not previously drenched with anthelmintics for one
month prior to the experiment. Goats with fecal egg count burdens in excess
of 1,000 eggs/gram of feces (for a total of at least 42 goats) had three consecutive
daily pretreatment fecal samples collected for egg concentration determination
using a McMaster chamber. Fecal eggs were categorized by type. Goats were
blocked according to worm infestation, and plant extracts were administered
once orally. Control goats were administered solvent or basal solution, and
the three nonzero dose levels were 20, 40 and 60 g dry matter of Kosso. Fecal
egg count were taken at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours postdosing to determine the
reduction in fecal egg counts. Count data was transformed using log(count+10)
and packed cell volume was transformed using arcsin function. Repeated measures
were analyzed using PROC MIXED of SAS. Otherwise, PROC GLM was used.
Results and Discussion
Heterogeneity of slope
was similar among variables except for the number of trichuris eggs (Table 1),
indicating that for all variables except trichuris eggs treatment effects were
similar among the different days of sampling. The only variable affected by
oral dosing with Kosso was the number of cestode eggs, being decreased. The
appearance of cestodes in feces occurred soon after dosing, starting only 1
day later. Different levels of Kosso were given to discern a minimal level
of Kosso necessary for anthelmintic effects. However, the results obtained
suggest need for further study of Kosso levels, since cestode egg levels were
similar among nonzero levels and numerically the number was greater for the
60 vs 20 and 40 g doses.
Conclusions
Kosso appears to hold
promise as an anthelmintic for cestode control in goats. However, further research
is needed to determine optimal levels of Kosso, as well as to identify mode
of action and specific fraction(s) of Kosso with anthelmintic activity. Furthermore,
there should be experimentation with other plants possibly possessing anthelmintic
activities, such as Glinus lotoides (Hirta). Such work might one day yield
low-cost and sustainable methods of internal parasite control for use in goat
production systems.
Acknowledgement
This research was supported
by USDA/FAS/ICD/RSED Project Number 58-3148-0914.
References
Abegaz, B, and Dagne, E. 1978. Comparative bioassay studies of some traditional
anthelmintic plants, plant extracts and modern drugs. Sinet: Ethiopia J.
Sci. 1:117-121.
Anderson, N., Martin, P.J., and Jarrett, R.G. 1988.
Mixtures of anthelmintics: A strategy against resistance. Aust. Vet. J. 65(2):62-63.
Blackburn, H.D., Rocha, J.L., Figueiredo, E.P., Berne, M.E., Vieira, L.S., Cavalcante,
A.R., and Rosa, J.S. 1991. Interaction of parasitism and nutrition and their
effects on production and clinical parameters in goats. Vet. Parasitol. 40:99-112.
DeVaney, J.A., Craig, T.M., and Row, L.D. 1992. Resistance to ivermectin by
Haemonchus contortus in goats and calves. Int. J. Parasitol. 22(3):369-376.
Dorny, P., Claerebout, E., Vercruysse, J., Jaila, A., and Sani, R. 1993. Benzimidazole
resistance of Haemonchus contortus in goats in Malaysia. Vet. Record
133:423-424.
Gray, G.D. 1987. Genetic resistance to haemonchosis
in sheep. Parasitol. Today 3(8):253-255.
Jackson, F. 1991. Anthelmintic resistance in
goats. Goat Vet. Soc. J. 12(1):1-6.
Maingi, N. 1991. Resistance to thiabendazole, fenbendazole and levamisole in
Haemonchus and Trichostrongylus species in sheep on a Kenyan farm.
Vet. Parasitol. 39:285-291.
McKenna, P.B. 1990. The detection of anthelmintic resistance by faecal egg
count reduction test: An examination of some of the factors affecting performance
and interpretation of. N.Z. Vet. J. 38:142-147.
Parker, A.G.H. 1991. Selection for resistance to parasites in sheep. Proc.
N.Z. Soc. Anim. Sci. 51:291-294.
Poore, M.H. 1993. Important factors to consider in meat goat management.
Meat Goat Field Day Handout, October 9, 1993, North Carolina State University,
Raleigh, NC.
Rahman, W.R., and Collins, G.H. 1990. Changes in liveweight gain, blood constituents
and worm egg output in goats artificially infected with a sheep-derived strain
of Haemonchus contortus. Br. Vet. J. 146:543-550.
SR-CSRP. Breeding a genetically improved dual purpose goat adapted for production
in Kenya. Small Ruminant - Collaborative Research Support Program 1990-91 Annual
Report, USAID. pp 9-23. University of California, Davis, Davis, CA.
Sofowora, A. 1982. Medicinal plants and traditional medicine in Africa. pp.75,
John Wiley and Sons limited.
Verady, M., Praslicka, J., Corbra, J., and Vesley, L. 1993. Multiple anthelmintic
resistance of nematodes in imported goats. Vet. Rec. 132(15):387-388.
Zajac, A.M. and Moore, G.A. 1993. Treatment and control
of gastrointestinal nematodes in sheep. Compend. Cont. Educ. Prac. Vet. 15(7):999-1011.
Table 1. Effects of level of oral administration of
Hagenia abyssinica (Kosso) on measures of internal parasitism in growing Alpine
goats
| |
Treatment
|
| |
0
|
20
|
40
|
60
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning weight, kg
|
16.3a
|
17.7a
|
20.6a
|
17.0a
|
|
Ending weight, kg
|
18.9a
|
20.4a
|
22.7a
|
21.1a
|
|
Packed cell volume, %
|
20.8a
|
23.3a
|
22.9a
|
21.6a
|
|
Egg counts, egg/g feces
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cestodes
|
1372.3a
|
171.5b
|
163.3b
|
707.2b
|
|
Eimeria
|
984.6a
|
854.4a
|
1459.5a
|
607.4a
|
|
Strongyles
|
1877.3a
|
1589.2a
|
1840.3a
|
1897.9a
|
|
Trichuris
|
1.4a
|
4.0a
|
5.7a
|
0.3a
|
|
Heterogeneity of slope for counts, egg/gr
feces/d
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cestodes
|
22.454a
|
-6.423b
|
-6.653b
|
-5.114b
|
|
Eimeria
|
10.144a
|
6.404a
|
6.599a
|
4.381a
|
|
Strongyles
|
-7.709a
|
-1.242a
|
-10.291a
|
-20.041a
|
|
Trichuris
|
-0.006a
|
0.414a
|
1.178b
|
-0.037a
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Heterogeneity of slope for packed cell
volume, %/d
|
0.014a
|
0.020a
|
0.026a
|
0.054a
|
|
|
 |
Figure 1.
Eggs per gram of feces for cestodes. |
|
|
 |
Figure 2.
Eggs per gram of feces for strongyles. |
|
|
 |
Figure 3.
Eggs per gram of feces for trichuris. |
|
|
 |
Figure 4.
Oocystes per gram of feces for eimeria. |
Citation:
Abebe, G., L.J. Dawson, G. Detweiler,
T.A. Gipson and T. Sahlu. 2000. Hagenia abyssinica (Kosso) for internal
parasite control in goats. In: R.C. Merkel, G. Abebe and A.L. Goetsch (eds.).
The Opportunities and Challenges of Enhancing Goat Production in East Africa.
Proceedings of a conference held at Debub University, Awassa, Ethiopia from
November 10 to 12, 2000. E (Kika) de la Garza Institute for Goat Research,
Langston University, Langston, OK pp. 190-195.
|